I thought this article by Mark Steyn was pretty interesting.  He’s (if I remember correctly) a  fairly conservative writer, but he does hit on some pretty interesting points.  Instead of engaging in dialogue the group he’s criticized has decided to fight him.  Not legitimately in a regular court for libel but by going to the Human Rights Tribunal.  He raises another valid point with this.  Why is it that the human rights tribunal here in Canada has a 100% conviction rate?  That sounds suspisciously like a system that can easily be milked, and according to Mark Steyn, that’s what’s going on.