The twitter hashtag is #patrobertsondoesntspeakforme.

There are two things that need to be addressed.

1. Those outside of Christianity who want to dismiss us all because of Pat Robertson are a close second to him in terms of ignorance.  If you ignore the work being done in Haiti, primarily by Christian organizations*, in favor of blasting us because Pat Robertson is an idiot (yes, I went there) you are as ignorant of Christianity as Pat Robertson is of Haiti.

Just because not all Christian organizations sink their money into PR, television broadcasting, etc. does not mean you get to choose the ones who are easy to find as representatives for us.  Thanks to free speech, we don’t get to stop him, and I can honestly say that outspending him on PR and TV time would make me worse of a Christian.  So dig a little deeper, learn a little more, don’t choose to be ignorant. The best place to start would be the New Testament, I recommend the book of Mark, or maybe one of Paul’s letters, heck there is even James. Those are representatives of Christianity.

2. Stop giving Pat Robertson money.  I don’t care what your leanings are in terms of politics, he gets to do what he does because of the donations he gets from Christians, so please, stop giving him your money. Here is the tool on TV.

After my colonial Latin America class I really wouldn’t blame the Haitians for making a deal with the devil**, because he would have been better than the French.

*Ed Stetzer has linked to the Baptish Global Response, World Vision informed me earlier today, when I called, that their disaster team is already on the ground.

** I’m not saying they did, I’m just saying I would not have blamed them if they did.

Tagged with:
 

Thinking is only thinking if it’s challenged, only then is it a verb.  Unchallenged thinking is only a thought and that, left unchallenged, is prejudice.  If you enter a conversation and there is no chance of anyone changing their perspectives it is a pointless exercise.

Where is this coming from?  Over the past few days I’ve had the opportunity, at this blog and elsewhere to witness people unwilling to accept challenges to their preconceived notions.   This frustrates me.  I’ve spent the majority of my life, with the exception of two years, in an environment that is antithetical to most of what I believe.  If you’re a Christian going through public education or university you are in an environment that at best tolerates you for your aberrant beliefs and at worst openly mocks what you believe.

Before you dismiss me and what I believe as stupid perhaps you should consider whether or not any of your perceptions of the world have ever faced serious or constant challenge.  Contrary to popular belief, you can move through life as an atheist or agnostic and never be seriously challenged intellectually.  It requires thinking to actually believe something.  Otherwise, it’s only a thought.

Tagged with:
 

My new career goal is to become a senior pastor at a megachurch. Essentially a megachurch pastor is the closest you can get to being a medieval bishop. You get a six day weekend by milking your congregants for all they are worth on Sundays. It’s almost like feudalism with the congregants as voluntary serfs. With the added bonus of being able to get married too. How ideal is that?

The similarities to bishopdom don’t end there. Beyond financial gains you also get authority gains. The church becomes your fiefdom, with you its true ruler. With enough lip service to God you can say and do whatever you want. With even more lip service you can claim that your orders are in fact the voice of God. Even more advantaegeous is that your role becomes hereditary. You can pass on your title to your children. Who are most likely already employed in your church. This is something even bishops couldn’t claim.

Yup, I think that once I achieve senior-pastorhood at one of these megachurches I will be set.  I can become a best selling author, be revered by thousands, and enjoy one of the shortest work weeks in the western world.  The perfect life.

 

Due to recent discoveries by leading linguists, software engineers at the University of Toronto are developing Automatic Messaging software. “What we’ve discovered is that there are roughly 5 IM (instant messaging) conversations that people have” saidTracy McMillan, head of linguistic studies, at a recent press conference detailing the new software. John Claverty, head of the software engineering program, continued “the key was to find ways to save time for the young people of today. I felt bad for them, having 15 conversations going at once, trying to keep all their friends happy. Dealing with drama” he continued, “We’ve created software based on keywords that automatically provides responses to common questions like, Sup? Huh? WTF? Allowing young people more time to focus on things like studying.”

What is most interesting about this development program is a rare show of cooperation between an Arts faculty and a Science faculty. At a campus already fractured by its college system this move goes a long way towards reconciliation. “It says to the arts colleges, if the liberal arts and sciences can get along, why can’t one Art college get along with another?” Says McMillan.

In other news, squirrels attack philosophy major student, thinking he’s nuts.

 

I think these ten dating tips may be the most important thing a Christian girl ever reads. How I found them is unimportant, how amazing they are is.
My personal favorites are:

5: If he reaches his arm around you… Tell him no one will ever be as close to you as Jesus is. (Or ask if you could “lay hands” on him in prayer)

6: If he tries to kiss you… Remind him that a kiss killed your savior (and you’re not ready to “speak in tongues”)

 

This was supposed to be a book but I don’t have the attention span.

I started writing about this last summer, but Brant Hansen reminded me of it today a few days ago with this post, (though why this one didn’t do it I’m not sure).

Perhaps we’re not all supposed to be leaders. I for one have noticed the trend that there are a lot of books about leading, leadership, being in charge, getting it your way, being a tyrant… ok, that last one may have been a bit extreme. My personal pet peeve is servant leadership. We talk a lot about how Jesus modelled servant leadership, and how that is to be our model. This seems to become yet another way of justifying leadership positions without much thought into the whole servant part of it.

Interesting fact, the phrase servant leadership doesn’t appear in the bible… ever. The idea of service, helping others, appears lots. It seems that the idea “Jesus was a leader therefore I’m supposed to be a leader too” is a bit skewed. Jesus was (and is) God on earth, and even he was willing to get down on his knees and wash his disciples feet. He was willing to touch the lepers to heal them, not send money, not say a prayer as he walked past, but actually put his hands on their (let’s be honest here) pretty gruesome bodies to help them.

So where am I going with this? I’m not sure. A friend of mine had this quote on his facebook profile and it is startling in its pointedness.

“If we were to set out to establish a religion in polar opposition to the Beatitudes Jesus taught, it would look strikingly similar to the pop Christianity that has taken over the airwaves of North America.”
- Tony Campolo

This, for me, is what the problem is. We want the blessings of the beatitudes before we have the attitude. We want and demand the privileges of leadership like Christ had, before we take on Christ’s character. We even go so far as to avoid, ignore, and even deny the hardships Christ faced to justify our privileged and comfortable positions. Some do it to justify the fact that they look a lot less like new testament pastors and apostles and more like old testament kings.

To a great extent I’m revealing my own hypocrisy here, I’m not much of a Christian or follower of Christ. On the other hand, I don’t claim to be a leader. I’m still working on the servant part, still learning to follow.

 

I have been under the impression recently that faith being spread through means of reason has failed; or at least it has failed in the west. We have armies of theologians and mountains of books, none of which do anything to change that Christianity has been in decline for the last fifty years. I’m still pretty convinced that the only way there will be any turn around in the western world is if we start to live our faith. Not just Sundays and around church, but living the radical, counter-cultural aspects of Christ’s life.

However, Professor Tingley, The Dean of Augustine College (Which I am currently attending), disagrees with me, at least in part. When I mentioned this in class on Friday his response got me thinking, “Has reasoned failed? The real question is: Has reason even been given a chance? People don’t come into contact with it.” This is the other aspect of our failure as the Western Church. We aren’t able to communicate the reasonableness of our faith. The secular world doesn’t know that we are not just blind and irrational but that we have reasons for believing what we do.

I understand this as a twofold failure. The first is that without Reason there is no attraction. Nobody wants to believe in an irrational faith. This is where apologetics has to be strong. Faith in practice is the other arm. Whether or not the faith is reasonable, it also has to work in peoples lives. This is where testimony comes in.

Testimony and Apologetics, these are what the western world needs today. And it needs them both equally. I guess this means my stance has been revised but not complete altered. Without the faith in practice we won’t see people willing to investigate the reasonableness of our faith. Without being prepared to defend the reasonableness of our faith even example isn’t enough. Paul knew this, why don’t we?  Why didn’t I?

 

There was a hot blog yesterday that was dealing with this whole “Jesus is dead, we have his grave to prove it” thing. I went there and was reading the comments. A few good comments of defense amid a myriad of idiotic, or irrelevant Christian responses, one person even brought evolution into it which is pointless in this instance.

Let us leave things like the incredulity of the Archaeological establishment about this tomb as found here and here aside. What really makes me sad is the glee with which the Atheists decided to trash Christianity. It feels like they want so badly to believe in nothing that they will jump on whatever bandwagon shuts down the most affrontive religion to exist. While doing what they accuse the Christians of doing: Not thinking through what they are saying.

I think the main thing that was ignored at the Urban Semiotic blog was the little detail that Christianity was heavily persecuted by the Jewish authorities in Roman controlled Israel. If you have a group of people preaching Christ crucified and resurrected, as they were preaching in the first century A.D., than the easiest thing to do is pull out the body or say “we have the grave right here”. They didn’t. What does this mean? If in the first 100 years after Christs death the movement he started exploded, even though it was founded on his resurrection, he must have come back. If in the face of massive opposition the disciples managed to convince people that Jesus truly ascended, and no one could bring out a body to say otherwise, than you have your case. If the Anitchristians in the same Era that Jesus lived couldn’t produce a body, I find it difficult to believe anyone 2000 years later can.

There is the old argument about how the disciples hid the body, leaving aside that it took at least six men to set a stone in front of the Roman guarded grave let us look at how these disciples died.
Peter – Crucifixion
Andrew – Crucifixion
James – Executed by the Sword
John – Old Age
Philip – Crucifixion
Bartholomew – Flayed alive than crucified (Ironically tradition maintains that his original name was Jesus, which he changed, apparently it was a pretty common name for the time)
Thomas – Killed in India by Spear of a pagan priest.
James – Crucified or just Martyred
Matthew – Martyred
Simon – Death by Saw
Matthias – Either Crucified or Stoned and Beheaded
Paul – Beheaded
These are how those who supposedly hid the body died. They died for preaching the message of this messiah. Wouldn’t it be a bit counter-intuitive to die for a message you made up?

I guess I’ve learned three things out of this whole story. The first is that there are Atheists who are just as pompous and rude as some of us Christians can be. The second is that Christians need to be trained in how to argue properly. I felt misrepresented by some of the unreasoned or just straight up ignorant comments that were made by Christians. The third thing is more of a reaffirmation of what I currently believe. Christianity is a reasonable religion, but we are not in an age where it is spread through reason. The only way Christianity has a hope of surviving in the modern west is through you and me (I’m assuming you are a Christian here) getting our acts together and start living the way Jesus asked us to. I’m just as, if not more, guilty than anyone else of being a hypocrite. I thank God everyday that I don’t believe in a God who expects perfection, but actually preempted my screwing things up by making things right when he died, then rose again, 2000 years ago.

 

CC License 

 

Warning: include(/home/69994/etc/...) [function.include]: failed to open stream: Permission denied in /nfs/c05/h01/mnt/69994/domains/liamkinnon.com/html/wp-content/themes/station/footer.php on line 80

Warning: include() [function.include]: Failed opening '/home/69994/etc/...' for inclusion (include_path='.:/usr/local/php-5.2.6-1/share/pear') in /nfs/c05/h01/mnt/69994/domains/liamkinnon.com/html/wp-content/themes/station/footer.php on line 80